The United Nations has lambasted the Zambian government for the suspension of Constitutional Lawyer John Sangwa saying basic principles were violated, reports Zambian Eye Correspondent.
This follows an outcry from many quarters over how the state handled the matter. The Judiciary has barred Sangwa from appearing on any court in Zambia accusing him of having issued disrespectable remarks against Judges during his Television discussion program.
The UN Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges & Lawyers, Diego García-Sayán, condemned the suspension.
“I strongly condemn blatant violations of human rights against Mr John Sangwa. Lawyers must be independent and preserve his lawyer’s professional and intellectual independence with regard to the courts and professional colleagues,” he said.
Meanwhile, the American Bar Association Center for Human Rights (ABA justice defenders) says a hearing should have been carried out to determine the lawyer’s fate.
“Suspension of Zambia lawyer John Sangwa without a hearing raises serious due process and freedom of expression concerns,” says the defenders for justice.
Sangwa has been a strong critic of the proposed constitutional amendment especially Bill number 10. He has also publicly stated that incumbent President Edgar Lungu does not qualify to run in 2021 polls because he has already twice elected as provided by the Constitution.
“The UN Basic Principles on Lawyers stipulates that lawyers like other citizens are entitled to freedom of expression and to take part in matters of public interest. International standards also provide that only in exceptional circumstances must a lawyer be immediately suspended,” says ABA.
Sangwa was suspended for alleged misconduct. “This serves to inform all the Hon. Addressees that by the direction of the Judiciary Mr John Sangwa S.C, an advocate practising under the firm of Simeza, Sangwa and Associates will not longer be allowed to appear before any court in Zambia until further notice.
“This action has been taken following a complaint of professional misconduct made by the judiciary to the Law Society of Zambia against the said Mr Sangwa, SC,” reads the letter signed by Boniface Mwiinga, acting registrar and director of court operations.
Meanwhile, section 29 on disciplinary powers of Court or judge apart from inquiry by disciplinary committee states that:
“Nothing in this Act contained shall supersede, lessen or interfere with the powers vested in the Chief Justice or any of the Judges of the Court to deal with the misconduct or offences by practitioners.”
John Sangwa for President!
Justice must be seen to be practiced and not the comedy we are seeing.
Actually, just as the concourt judges are unqualified, I propose that the minimum qualifications for members of parliament should be raised. This is because you can only see the difference when you listen to debates from other world parliaments. Our parliament debates are full of comedy and less seriousness.
On Sangwa SC, it’s a shame that the Judiciary in this country cannot function in a professional manner. Talking of the rule of law in this country, we have a long way to go. Ministers occupied offices illegally and up to date, they have not paid the money.
Why ban him for pointing out the minimum qualifications for the judge position? Why not just state how you qualify and it ends there? Silencing Sangwa won’t end the debate. It’s a democracy. People need to talk
This is an interational embarrassment of the highest order ! Umusebanya weka weka
Let the international community intervene by way of looking into the matter and ascertain whether the man in question did violet the rules as envisaged in the constitution of the land and the human rights chatter, otherwise we are in for it
Good. These PF clowns are becoming increasingly arrogant and dictatorial by the minute. Primarily because Zambians don’t create much of a fuss about anything.
Next the international community should slap sanctions on them. They would reverse this and other stupid tyrannical decisions with a quickness.