No person was arrested in Kalabo over Barotseland issue – Government

Filed under: Breaking News |
712 Views

The Zambian government has denied having arrested any person in Kalabo this year in connection with the defunct Barotseland Agreement of 1964 (BA 64).

Responding to a question on Tuesday 10th December 2013 by Sikongo Member of Parliament Mundia Ndalamei, who wanted to know how many people were arrested in Kalabo in connection with the defunct BA 64 as of 30th September 2013, and when the Zambian government will resolve the Barotse impasse, a Zambian Deputy Minister said that the BA 64 was not the root cause of what was happening in Western Province (Barotseland), and claimed that the problem was the general underdevelopment in the area which was being resolved by the Zambian government through creation of more districts.

Hon.Mundia Ndalamei was not satisfied with the response and, therefore, questioned the Minister as to why the Zambian government was arresting people in Barotseland, to which the Minister responded with a straight lie, saying that they never arrested any person in connection with issues arising from the defunct BA 64, and stressed that the government only arrested people over ‘treason’ charges.

“I am not aware! The people arrested were talking about succession, this is one Zambia and those people were arrested on conduct bordering on treason,” he said.

At this point Monze Central MP Jack Mwiimbu raised a point of order to the Deputy Minister for misleading the house on a clear matter, to which the Speaker told the minister to take note of the point of order as he responds.

But the minister responded to the Speaker that he was not aware of these arrests.

Kalabo Central MP Chinga Miyutu, then charged that the Minister was failing to tell the truth, and wondered whether the Minister was not aware that people had been arrested in Kalabo because they want to reclaim their land which is Barotseland.

The Minister then said there were different arms of government, and what the police did was to arrest people based on ‘conduct’, and the other matters were up to the courts to interpret.

Mwandi MP Michael Kaingu then jumped on the bandwagon, and pointed out that the ‘one Zambia one nation’ that the Minister was referring to came as a result of a Zambia born through the BA 64.

Lukulu East MP Christopher Kalila asked when government will release the Roger Chongwe Commission of inquiry report to the public.

Zambian Home Affairs Minister, and acting leader of government business in the house, Edgar Lungu responded that what he knows was that the Roger Chongwe Commission was on the Mongu riots and it never dealt with the contents of the BA 64.

Lungu went further to give a conflicting answer that the issue in Western Province (Barotseland) was about poverty, and the Zambian government was working hard to lift the poverty levels in the area, adding that the Roger Chongwe Commission was on the Mongu riots that bordered on succession.

Kalomo MP Request Muntanga asked why the government had failed to enforce the BA 64 in its totality since the PF were talking about decentralization of power for people to govern themselves.

Lungu then responded that the BA 64 was about recognizing chiefs, and taking power to the people for them to govern themselves, and stressed that there was no contradiction with the PF policy of decentralization and BA 64, adding that he was happy that Zambia was moving forward as one Zambia and one nation.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

8 Responses to No person was arrested in Kalabo over Barotseland issue – Government

  1. AS far as i am concerned North-western and North-Eastern Rhodesian merged in 1911 to come up with Northern Rhodesia the present day Zambia and Livingstone as its capital at that time,i am sure that is the time when barotse kingdom stopped existing to become chiefdom.I even wonder what Kaunda was signing for.In fact Sata is being fair to them otherwise the should be hanged to death by bring confusions the peaceful country like Zambia.

    Nazo
    December 12, 2013 at 10:03 am
    Reply

    • Little knowledge can really be dangerous!

      Maano
      December 12, 2013 at 1:58 pm
      Reply

      • It is true. Batswana bare, kitso potana e borai(little knowledge is dangerous).

        One
        December 12, 2013 at 6:23 pm
        Reply

  2. AS far as i am concerned North-western and North-Eastern Rhodesian merged in 1911 to come up with Northern Rhodesia the present day Zambia and Livingstone as its capital at that time,i am sure that is the time when barotse kingdom stopped existing to become chiefdom.I even wonder what Kaunda was signing for.In fact Sata is being fair to them otherwise the should be hanged to death by bring confusions to the peaceful country like Zambia.

    Nazo
    December 12, 2013 at 10:06 am
    Reply

    • @NAZO, are you able to explain as to why at independence the Northern Rhodesian territory was divided into four types of land, namely Crownland, Trustland, Native Reserves, and Barotseland? May be you can pick up pieces of knowledge from there as you trace and glean the facts backwards and forwards.

      By the way, what was the essence of natives fight for independence from colonial rule – was it not to regain the rights and freedoms that were usurped by colonial masters? What were those rights – wasn’t self-determination part of those rights? What was the status of Barotseland before, during and immediately after independence? Did Barotseland ever accept to be colonised or dominated by Zambia? Grateful to hear your answer to these pertinent questions, @NAZO.

      Maano
      December 12, 2013 at 2:41 pm
      Reply

  3. The question of the status of Western Province was conclusively dealt with by The Right Honorable Vice President of the Republic of Zambia,Dr.Guy Scott.,MP. in his address to Parliament in reaction to that BRE council/conclave on secession.That is the general position of Government which the the Zambian citizenry and the international community is aware of, and satisfied with.But in a democracy such as ours,we should allow sporadic gunfire from some MPs who must be seen to be working.
    Pockets of resistance shall be meeting mop-up operations as and when necessary, and in accordance with the full provisions of the laws of the land.
    Progress please.

    MuZambian
    December 12, 2013 at 11:51 am
    Reply

  4. the pf mps are dull..kekekekekekee

    pompwe
    December 12, 2013 at 12:50 pm
    Reply

  5. Pf mps are stupid just like icipuba ca bo chi data

    munsha
    December 12, 2013 at 1:45 pm
    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.