Kenyatta’s threats on the judiciary in Kenya Should be condemned

Filed under: International News,Special Comments |

President Kenyatta addressing the nation

By Munyonzwe Hamalengwa

It is quite unpalatable that the world praised President Uhuru Kenyatta for accepting the decision of the court nullifying the Presidential Election while disagreeing with it but not condemning his serious follow-up attack on the judiciary. The attack nullified his so-called acceptance of the judicial ruling. The world by not condemning his not veiled but open and overt attack is encouraging impunity on judicial attacks by powers-that-be that may induce the judiciary to retreat into its usual cocoon. 

Shortly after Kenyatta had sobered up from the shock of the nullification of the election result, he launched into a sour-loser mold, typical of entitled world dictators by calling the judiciary “corrupt” and demanding to know who elected them and then threatening to “fix” the judiciary after a victory on the rerun! The world never condemned this attack on the independence of the judiciary.

Kenyatta knows very well that in the separation of powers schema under the rule of law, the judiciary is not elected but appointed through the Judicial Service Commission. The judiciary derives its legitimacy not from elections like the Presidency or the Legislature, but threw the selection process and attributes of independence, impartiality, security of tenure, judicial ethics and other accoutrements. He is trying to undermine the judiciary by taking refugee in the underhanded cocoons of a terrified presidential kleptocracy, worn-out arguments of Yesteryears.

It took a lot of effort and constitutional reforms to enable the Kenyan judiciary to be able to make the decision that it made on September 1st, 2017. The President was stripped of making  patronage judicial appointments. He is now just handed the name of the person he has to appoint ceremonially by the independent Judicial Service Commission, a body that was also reformed and is now independent.  So what is he going to fix? But his threats were direct. He stated that the judiciary, principally the Chief Justice Maraga must not assume that Kenyatta fears the judiciary because he doesn’t. “We don’t fear you”, he harangued. Is he threatening physical harm here? Imagine a weak-kneed judge hearing this message from the President of his or her country? This is intimidation of the highest order. Imagine also a deranged tribalist hearing this message from his or her President! He or she will think it is open season on the judiciary. Kenya has a lot of unsolved murders of politicians, lawyers, election officials and had endured massive election violence. The threat on the judiciary and the implications of physical harm is thus not farfetched. Kenyatta himself had been indicted by the International Criminal Court for perpetrating crimes against humanity in the election of 2007 and only escaping conviction because among others, his regime committed obstruction of justice by threatening witnesses. So Kenyatta is capable of living up to the threats that he is issuing. He has done it before. He had been charged before.

Thus the international community should have condemned Kenyatta’s threats with the most voluble censure, also to discourage other Dictators from emulating Kenyatta’s threats on the judiciary. The Kenyan Judicial precedent in nullifying the rigged and flawed election must be protected. The constitutional and judicial reforms that led to the possibility of that result must be emulated throughout Africa.

The judiciary doesn’t belong to the politicians. It belongs to the people. It is to serve the people.

Dr. Munyonzwe Hamalengwa teaches Criminal Law, Jurisprudence, Intellectual Property Law, Medical-Legal Law and Graduate Research Methodologies at Zambian Open University in Lusaka. Email: Munyonzwe. 

4 Responses to Kenyatta’s threats on the judiciary in Kenya Should be condemned

  1. He thinks it’s his father’s farm!

    BoWise
    September 5, 2017 at 3:05 pm
    Reply

  2. The Kenyan Election has rubbished and discredited Foreign Election Observers. The validation of Elections by Foreign Observers is now useless. All thinking Kenyans shouldnt vote for Huru becoz he has threatened to destroy the Judiciary should he win the Election Rerun. What Kenya and Africa needs are strong institutions especially the Judiciary.Uhuru wants to rataliate for the nullifican of his reelection and weaken the Judiciary. This must stop by voting out this potential Dictator. As for Zambia Lungu can no longer claim his legitimacy on Foreign Observers validation and for this Reason the Petition must be heard without fail. There are more irregularities and illegalities in the 2016 Election. Outstanding illegalities include Lungu refusing to handover power to the Speaker during the aborted Petition Hearing,Lungu has no Concourt declaration ,Emmanuel Chavula a Ugandan was caught in the ECZ Server Room altering election results in favour of Lungu,No G12 Certificates etc. As of now Lungu is in State House illegally,undemocratically and unconstitutionally.#Let the Petition be heard in Court. Period.

    Zulu
    September 6, 2017 at 5:10 am
    Reply

  3. I’m extremely impressed with your writing skills and also with the layout on your blog.
    Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself?
    Either way keep up the excellent quality writing, it’s rare to see a great blog like this one today.

    Silvia Odete Morani Massad
    September 6, 2017 at 7:38 pm
    Reply

  4. It’s truly very difficult in this full of activity life
    to listen news on Television, so I only use web for that reason,
    and get the hottest news.

    https://www.thesun.co.uk
    September 9, 2017 at 5:42 am
    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *